58Determining Optimal Location of Agriculture Based on Multi Criteria Evaluation in GIS (Case Study: Dezful city)


The population growth expands different types of urban, residential and industrial functions that are worrying for agricultural lands. So, understanding the capacity of land and land allocation to consistent applications with its features is essential. In order to determine the suitability of land for agricultural activities has conducted. So we can help the planners to achieve sustainable development. In this re-search, maps got fuzzy in Idrisi environment using Analytic Network Process (ANP) and finally the respective zones in GIS environment and the final map indicating areas with good potential for agricultural development was obtained. The results showed in this research the approach of Weighted Linear Combination (WLC), despite its simplicity, it has some disadvantages, like overestimation, while in the Ordered Weight Analysis (OWA) algorithm; the result of locating has finer resolution. In the area of study, in WLC, 57.58 percent of area is in suitable and relatively suitable zone and in OWA, 51.54 per-cent of the area is in suitable and relatively suitable area. Due to the final map the most suitable area of agricultural development is in the southeastern part of the city, from northeast to south. These zones, because of lower slope, good soil and less erosion are highly suitable for agricultural development.

Keywords: Fuzzy, ANP, agriculture land use site selection, Dezful city, WLC, OWA


  • Lavalle, C., Demicheli, L., Turchini, M., Casals Carrasco, P., & Niederhuber, M. Monitoring mega-cities: the MURBANDY/MOLAND approach. Development in Practice, 11, 350–357. 2001.

  • Makowski, D., Nesme, T., Papy, F., Dore, T.,. Global agronomy, a new field of research: a review. Agron. Sustain. Dev doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13593- 013-0179-0. 2013.

  • Rahmani, H.R., 2010. Sustainable agriculture and challenges of production health yield. Nosooh publication

  • Dushaj, L., Salillari, I.,Suljoti, V., Cenameri, M., Sallaku, F., “Application on gis for land use planning: a case study in central part of Albania”. Paper published. 2009.

  • Jankowski, P.. Integrating geographical information systems and multiple criteria decision-making methods. International journal of geographical information systems, 9(3), 251-273. 1995.

  • Voogd, H.. Multicriteria evaluation for urban and regional planning. Taylor & Francis. 1983.

  • Eastman, J.R. IDRISI: The Kilimanjaro edition. Worcester, MA: Clark University. 2003

  • Yager, R. R. On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on, 18(1), 183-190. 1988.

  • Mendes, J. F., & Motizuki, W. S. Urban quality of life evaluation scenarios: The case of Sao Carlos in Brazil. CTBUH review, 1(2), 13-23. 2001.

  • Eastman, J. R. IDRISI for Windows v. 2.0. Worcester, UK: Clark University. 1997.

  • Jiang, H., & Eastman, J. R. Application of fuzzy measures in multi-criteria evaluation in GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14(2), 173-184. 2000.

  • Rastgar, M. H., Karimi, S., Balist, J., & Noraisefat, I. Ecological Capability Evaluation to Determine Suitable Areas for Agriculture Using Fuzzy Logic and AHP Technique in GIS (Casestudy, Divandarreh city). AMERICAN-EURASIAN JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE, 35-43. 2015.

  • Noori, H., Assessment ecological capability for agriculture areas prone using GIS. Journal of geography and environmental planning, 21(1). 2010.

  • Javanmardi, S., et al., Multi Criteria evaluate land suitability for agriculture using GIS – Case Study: Qazvin. Environmental researches, 2(4). 2011.

  • Wu, W. W., & Lee, Y. T. Selecting Knowledge Management Strategies by using the Analytic Network Process. Expert Systems with Applications, , pp.841–847. 2007.

  • Bonham-Carter, G., Geographic Information Systems for Geoscientists: Modelling with GIS.: Pergamon, Ontario.

  • Latinopoulos D, Kechagia K, A GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation for wind farm site selection. A regional scale application in Greece, Renewable Energy, 78 550-560. 2015.

  • Saaty, T. L. Theory and applications of the analytic network process: decision making with benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks. RWS publications. 2005

  • Saaty, T. L. Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process. Pittsburgh. RWS Publications, 7, 557-570. 2001.

  • Liang, X., Sun, X., Shu, G., Sun, K., Wang, X., & Wang, X. Using the analytic network process (ANP) to determine method of waste energy recovery from engine. Energy Conversion and Management, 66, 304-311. 2013.

  • Malczewski, J. Ordered weighted averaging with fuzzy quantifiers: GIS-based multicriteria evaluation for land-use suitability analysis. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 8(4), 270-277. 2006.

  • Yager, R. R. Including a diversity criterion in decision making.International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 25(9), 958-969. 2010.

  • Malczewski J., Chapman T., Flegel C., Walters D., Shrubsole D., and Healy M.A. (2003). GIS-multicriteria evaluation with ordered weighted averaging (OWA): case study of developing management strategies. Environ. Plan. 35 (10): 1769–1784.

  • Eastman, Ronald, , Idrisi selva tutorial, Clark university.2012

  • Carlsson C., Fuller R., and Fuller S. OWA operators for doctoral student selection problem. pp 167–177.In: Yager R.R, Kacprzyk .J. (ed.) the ordered weighted averaging operators: theory, methodology, and applications. Kluwer, Boston. 1997.