812-D Homogeneous Modeling and Simulation of Catalytic WGS Reactor


In this paper, a simulation of a fixed bed reactor for water gas shift reaction, which forms part of a hydrogen production, was carried out. A commercial CuO/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst was employed and a two-dimensional homogeneous model was applied for the simulation. The kinetic information has been taken from literature for the WGS reaction. The distribution of concentration in fluid bulk as well as porous catalyst, rate of reaction, pressure profile and superficial velocity distribution were represented as results of study. The simulation results validated using pressure drop of the reactor obtained via Darcy’s law as well as equilibrium conversions.  gPROMS, a general purpose modeling package, was used for modeling and simulation of the water–gas shift reaction.

Keywords: WGS Reaction, Homogeneous Modeling, Simulation, Fixed bed Reactor, gPROMS


  • C. Ratnasamy and J. P. Wagner, “Water gas shift catalysis,” Catalysis Reviews, vol. 51, pp. 325-440, 2009.
  • S. Lee, Encyclopedia of chemical processing. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2006.
  • D. S. Newsome, “The water-gas shift reaction,” Catalysis Reviews Science and Engineering, vol. 21, pp. 275-318, 1980.
  • T. A. Adams and P. I. Barton, “A dynamic two-dimensional heterogeneous model for water gas shift reactors,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 34, pp. 8877-8891, 2009.
  • G. Jacobs and B. Davis, “Low temperature water-gas shift catalysts,” Catalysis, vol. 20, pp. 122-285, 2007.
  • A. Iordanidi, Mathematical modeling of catalytic fixed bed reactors: Twente University Press, 2002.
  • Y. Choi and H. G. Stenger, “Water gas shift reaction kinetics and reactor modeling for fuel cell grade hydrogen,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 124, pp. 432-439, 2003.
  • P. Giunta, N. Amadeo, and M. Laborde, “Simulation of a low temperature water gas shift reactor using the heterogeneous model/application to a pem fuel cell,” Journal of power sources, vol. 156, pp. 489-496, 2006.
  • G. Wright and T. Edgar, “Nonlinear model predictive control of a fixed-bed water-gas shift reactor: an experimental study,” Computers & chemical engineering, vol. 18, pp. 83-102, 1994.
  • J. A. Francesconi, M. C. Mussati, and P. A. Aguirre, “Analysis of design variables for water-gas-shift reactors by model-based optimization,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 173, pp. 467-477, 2007.
  • O. Ding and S. Chan, “Water–gas shift reaction–A 2-D modeling approach,” international journal of hydrogen energy, vol. 33, pp. 4325-4336, 2008.
  • W.-H. Chen, M.-R. Lin, T. L. Jiang, and M.-H. Chen, “Modeling and simulation of hydrogen generation from high-temperature and low-temperature water gas shift reactions,” international journal of hydrogen energy, vol. 33, pp. 6644-6656, 2008.
  • C. Multiphysics, “Packed Bed Reactor,” in Chemical Reaction Engineering Module-Model Library Manual, ed, 2014.
  • D. Mendes, V. Chibante, A. Mendes, and L. M. Madeira, “Determination of the Low-Temperature Water− Gas Shift Reaction Kinetics Using a Cu-Based Catalyst,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 49, pp. 11269-11279, 2010.
  • D. Mendes, H. Garcia, V. Silva, A. Mendes, and L. M. Madeira, “Comparison of nanosized gold-based and copper-based catalysts for the low-temperature water− gas shift reaction,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 48, pp. 430-439, 2008.
  • D. Mohammady Maklavany, A. Shariati, B. Roozbehani, and M. R. Khosravi Nikou, “Kinetic Modeling of Low Temperature Water-Gas Shift Reaction using gPROMS,” American Journal of Oil and Chemical Technologies, vol. 4, pp. 10-16, 2016.
  • O. Levenspiel, Chemical reaction engineering: John Wiley & Sons 1999.R. H. Perry, D. W. Green, J. O. Maloney, M. M. Abbott, C. M. Ambler, and R. C. Amero, Perry’s chemical engineers’ handbook vol. 7: McGraw-hill New York, 1997.
  • J. Kugai, “Heat and mass transfer in fixed-bed tubular reactor,” Report Submitted to College of Earth and Mineral Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, USA.2008.
  • C. S. Slichter, “Theoretical investigation of the motion of ground waters,”  U.S. Geological Survey 19th Annual Report, Part II, p. 295-384, 1899.